|
A FREE EXTRA DECADE OF LIFE #13
DO STOMACHS GET TIME-AND-A-HALF FOR OVERTIME?
In the world of baseball it's considered to be the ultimate
sacrifice. No, I'm not talking about bunting the runner over to second
base. And I'm not talking about a superstar player agreeing to play for
only eight million a year, in order to help the team be more competitive
overall. (That'll be the day, won't it?) But for a top-of-the-line pitcher,
the guy who works Opening Day, and Game 1 of the Series, it's to pitch
ON THREE DAYS' REST. You pitch Sunday afternoon, and just 96 hours later,
on Thursday night, you're there on the mound again.
The reason it's a big deal is because in the big leagues today, the normal
rotation is that you pitch every FIVE days. You pitch one day, then you're
off . . . and off . . . and off . . . and off. Four days of rest for your
arm before you go out there and throw another 110 pitches. Four's the
norm, and three is really pushing it. Unless it's a playoff game, or a
really must-win situation, a manager knows that this particular ten-million-dollar
arm has got to sit on the sidelines for four days between starts.
Well, friend, that sounds like many ballparks removed from where we've
studying together: the topic of health and diet. And yet, as you sit there
in the orange seats at Dodger Stadium, this brings us to a very controversial
S-word. And that S-word is "snacks." Eating between meals. Dodger
dogs and cracker jacks and cotton candy and peanuts and pretzels. Not
breakfast. Not lunch. Not dinner or supper. But something a little bit
extra tucked in between the three main events of the day. A few bonus
calories during the seventh inning stretch.
Our textbook here in this radio series has been the new bestseller: Live
10 Healthy Years Longer. And authors Jan Kuzma and Cecil Murphey make
us blush with a 30-year-old statistic, going clear back to 1970, where
researchers found out that a full 30% of the food Americans were eating
was in the form of snacks. Now, you tell me, do you think that number's
gone down or up since then?
And the reason we thought right away of baseball pitchers, and pitching
on three days' rest, was this statement these authors make here in Chapter
13:
"Your body has natural rhythms," they write.
"One of those rhythms occurs in the digestive tract. Every time you
snack, you interrupt the digestive process."
I'm thankful that Jan and Cecil, in discussing this topic, allow for a
great deal of latitude. There are people who, for medical reasons, do
need to snack. Parents need to be generous, and err on the side of cutting
some slack when it comes to growing children. And no, the topic of snacking
isn't the top one in this book; there ARE deadlier sins out there in the
world of food. But they do describe for us a medical experiment, which
has actually been run a number of times. They gave some regular people
a good, solid breakfast . . . and then timed to see how long before the
stomach was done with it. Average: 4½ hours. If you have a good
breakfast at 7:00 a.m., by 11:30 your stomach is completely done and it
gets a little break.
Next they had one member of the control group eat an ice cream cone two
hours before that good breakfast. His digestion time for breakfast jumped
from 4.5 to six hours.
Part two. Three of the members of the panel had breakfast, then also had
snacks every half hour . . . but did skip lunch. Snacks included a peanut
butter sandwich, some pumpkin pie with milk, and half a slice of buttered
bread. What were the results? A good NINE hours after breakfast, there
was still food FROM breakfast in their stomachs . . . not to mention the
pie and peanut butter.
Now on to part three: lucky person #5 - or unlucky, as we shall see -
had the good breakfast. Then two hours later, two chocolate candy bars.
(Sound familiar? Don't raise your hand there on the freeway.) Then lunch.
Then, between lunch and dinner, two more candy bars. And what happened
in this guy's tummy? Thirteen-and-a-half hours after breakfast, more than
half OF his breakfast was still churning around down there. Plus the candy
bars, of course. Plus parts of lunch, dinner, and the whole hog.
Now friend, whatever else might be said - and yes, we all see ourselves
here in one way or another - a stomach treated that way simply is not
getting its rest. It's working nonstop. And sooner or later, if you don't
go to the bullpen, you're going to be going to the emergency room instead.
"Race horses don't race every day." Cecil and Jan add this warning:
"Logic says that if your eating habits fatigue
and weaken the digestive system, that weakening - even if you don't feel
it physically - will extend to other parts of your body. That's reason
enough to avoid snacking."
One reality we all know about is that, as Jan
and Cecil put it, "Appetite is a learned response." Do we always
reach for a snack because we truly are hungry and our body needs sustenance?
Or does something just taste good? Have we gotten programmed to WANT a
bit of sugar around 10:30 in the morning? Do we often snack for emotional
reasons? Sure we do.
One of the great food-and-diet specialists out there is Dr. John Scharffenberg,
a Harvard-trained nutritionist now serving at Loma Linda University. He's
a colorful, fun guy to work with, and his lectures are very compelling.
He's done some study on this issue of "grazing," where a person
eats small amounts all during the day. Now, again, there are people who,
medically speaking, need to do this. And there's research which does demonstrate
that some people can graze and maintain their weight. But Scharffenberg
details six reasons why grazing can be dangerous:
1. The process called "demineralization," a subtle breakdown
on the crystal framework of your teeth, goes on for two hours anytime
you eat. Until you brush, of course. If you graze all day, that wear-down
is pretty much continuous. Number two, your blood triglycerides spike
up every time you eat. Sticky platelets can lead to clotting and heart
attacks.
Number three: blood sugar stays high. So you need more insulin. Heart
attacks lurk around that corner too. Four: if you digest three good meals
a day, instead of those exact same amounts of food spread out in a day-long
graze, you burn up about 40 calories a day more with the three biggies.
It's a small thing, but every bit helps.
Number five: grazing can lead to a real psychological dependence on food,
a fixation on it - especially if you never really get full. Food can become
a conflict-resolution tool. People use snacks to get through emotional
trauma, then suffer with guilt afterward. It becomes a roller coaster.
Finally, number six - depletion of your stomach's hydrochloric acid. Grazing
can also disturb your sleep. And - if you're eating a lot of empty calories
- malnutrition could be where you're heading.
Well, once again, let's take our last few minutes and go over to the dessert
counter marked "Getting Practical." If snacking is a deeply
ingrained habit, how can we triumph over it?
Jan and Cecil have just two words to say about breakfast: EAT IT! Start
with a good breakfast. Now, don't borrow a page from that very cute scene
in the black-and-white comedy from a few years ago, Pleasantville, where
the Year 2000 teenage boy and girl, transported back into TV Land, encounter
a loving mother who piles the breakfast table full of pancakes (with syrup),
waffles (with syrup), French toast (with berries and whipped cream), greasy
potatoes (with oil), pastries (with sugar), huge slabs of meat (with gravy),
six-egg omelets (with cholesterol.) And the black-and-white dad pushes
a plate of Mother's blueberry muffins on the kids. "These are swell,"
he says, vibrating with 1950s enthusiasm. Like I say, it wouldn't be too
keen to go that far. But begin the day by really "breaking your fast"
and having your most substantial meal of the day. In fact, PLAN that you
WILL have three substantial meals daily, at regular times: a full breakfast,
lunch, and dinner. With, by the way, good servings of grain, fruits, and
vegetables.
Then, when you feel like you simply have to have a snack, have a big glass
of water instead. Flavor it with lemon and lime, if that helps.
And I thought this tip was helpful. Simply learn to say "No, thank
you." I have to confess that here at the office there are times when
some food comes around at three in the afternoon. "It's Phil's birthday,
and Lance and Lynn brought in some cake! Over in Accounting. Come on by!"
Well, I've had some, and there are times when you smile and do a little
bending. But it IS all right to just say instead, "Man, that looks
good but . . . no thanks. I'm trying to cut back." Or this: "Sure,
cut me a piece. I'll save it and have it with my dinner."
Hard to do? Yes. It's a choice. But successful people in the Live-Longer
Lifestyle - those who live 10 to 13 years longer - find the strength to
make that choice. When they fail, which we all do, they simply renew that
commitment and keep on going. And the bottom line is - speaking of baseball
- they get to see a lot more postseason games.
|