Copyright © 2001 by The Voice of Prophecy
David B. Smith

P.O. Box 53055    
Los Angeles, CA 90053   

Listen to Real Audio Broadcast
October 18, 2001

 

MORE THAN A GOOD TEACHER #4

NO ABSOLUTION FROM ARISTOTLE

We received a letter a few weeks ago that was one of the most anguished cries for help I can recall. A young woman was involved in heavy promiscuity, and also heavy drug use. In fact, the promiscuity was mostly for the purpose of funding the drugs.

But then a heartrending confession. This mother had a very small child: a daughter who was something like 18 months, two years old. And in her cash-starved desperation, there had actually been times when she permitted some forms of sex that involved that baby girl. What that means, I don't even want to think about . . . but there are tragic stories out there that do go on all around us.

And the cry in these brief lines was for forgiveness. "Can God ever, ever possibly forgive me for what I've done?" How could such a wicked thing ever be wiped away? This mom honestly wondered if perhaps she was beyond redemption.

I suppose the sins in the classic books The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the companion volume about a naughty boy named Huck Finn were much more innocent. But their creator, Mark Twain, is said to have once observed — and oh so true:

"Man is the only animal that blushes — or needs to."


The existence of guilt, and the subsequent need for forgiveness is a powerful ache that resides within most of us. In his book Confession and Absolution, Jack Winslow describes a large mental hospital over in England, and the director of the institution, who made this startling admission:

"I could dismiss half my patients tomorrow if they could be assured of forgiveness."


What would it mean to this young mother, who has committed such a vile sexual crime as to involve her baby daughter, if she could know that she was completely and freely and fully and totally forgiven? To know that all the record of her wrong, the stain on her record, had been wiped away? What would that be worth?

In his book, The Contemporary Christian, John Stott describes a confession coming from the lips of Marghanita Lanski, one of the great novelists. This woman was also an avowed secular humanist, and she once said to a religious believer: "What I envy most about you Christians is your forgiveness; I have nobody to forgive me."

But do Christians indeed have such an advantage as this thing called forgiveness? In our discussion yesterday, we pondered the mystery of a Man named Jesus walking around saying to perfect strangers: "You hurt your neighbor; you cheated on your friends, but I forgive you." By what right did He do that? And the Pharisees were absolutely right when they said: "Only God can forgive sins." Which, there in Luke 5, Jesus countered by immediately healing the crippled person who was seeking two new legs and a brand new forgiven heart.

Maybe you believe that story; maybe you don't. But there seems to be a link here. Forgiveness comes from God. Or from Jesus if He's the Son of God. But only through Jesus because of Calvary. And only through Calvary IF Jesus was the Son of God on the cross of Calvary.

If you take the Word of God at face value — which we determine to do here at this radio ministry — there's abundant evidence to support this entire train of logic. Here's First John 3:16:

"This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down His life for us."
"Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." John 1:29


That was John the Baptist, referring to Jesus. And of course we move over just two chapters to the most beloved, most quoted verse in the world. John 3:16:

"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life."


Notice that John clearly specifies that eternal life — which implies forgiveness, of course — comes from this only begotten Son. It does come from Jesus. And furthermore, it declares plainly that Jesus, this Redeemer, IS the Son of God. Again I say, forgiveness is linked to Jesus, but only to Jesus as God's Son.

And this is the probing question we have to wrestle with, together with each of you. What if Jesus was nothing more than a good Teacher? What if the legacy of Jesus included great Gospel stories, and those marvelous parables, and His command — make that suggestion; a mere teacher can't very well command — that we love one another? But what if that were it? What is at stake if Jesus Christ is, or isn't, more than a wise man?

John Stott's book has a chapter entitled "The Uniqueness of Jesus Christ," which is a title we heartily endorse, of course. But what if Jesus were just one of the world's great spiritual minds? Buddha certainly was. His writings have helped shape the lives of millions. But is he able to offer forgiveness? Here's what Stott writes on that question:

"Buddhism sees the human predicament in suffering rather than sin, and in the ‘desire' which it sees as the root of suffering. Deliverance comes only through the abolition of desire by self-effort. There is no God and no Savior. ‘Strive without ceasing' were the Buddha's last words to his disciples before he died."

"Strive without ceasing." Jesus, in contrast, said to sad and discouraged sinners: "Come unto Me, and I will give you rest." But was He telling the truth?

You know, there are some things we can be confident of just from history. Fact: There was a person named Jesus. Fact: He lived in ancient Israel, and taught and preached around the year 30 A.D. Fact: He was executed on a cross by the Roman authorities, in cooperation with the Jewish leaders of that era. Nobody debates those points. This is in all the history books.

But . . . did this Jesus die for our sins? Well, that's where you have to step beyond the history books and believe in the Bible. You have to believe what this Person Himself said.

Here's the sobering question: if Jesus were just a good man — not divine, not the "Son of God," but simply another in a line of men like Plato and Aristotle and Buddha — and then was crucified, what would it mean regarding our sins? People in that era died on crosses all the time. Three men that we know of died that very Friday afternoon. Did the deaths of the two criminals, one on each side of Jesus, have any implications for our sins? Did they provide any kind of forgiveness? None whatsoever. But then, why would the death of the Man on the center cross be any different?

The answer, of course, is that it doesn't . . . unless Jesus is more than a good teacher. Unless Jesus is the Son of God, the Lamb of God, the Lamb sent from God, then His blood on the sand of Golgotha doesn't mean anything at all.

This takes us into a topic we'll continue to explore further in our two-week series: the Resurrection. The resurrection is what assures us of forgiveness of our sins. It wasn't enough for Jesus to die on a cross; many people have done that. He had to die, and then to live again, in order for us to be guaranteed forgiveness. Why?

Jesus Himself always linked our forgiveness to His own death. He said so many times.

"But how can we know that He was right," Stott asks, "that He achieved by His death what He said He would achieve, and that God accepted His death in our place as ‘a full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction, for the sins of the whole world'? The answer is that, if He had remained dead, if He had not been visibly and publicly raised from death, we would never have known. Rather, without the resurrection we would have to conclude that His death was a failure."

The Apostle Paul emphatically made this very point. If Jesus isn't resurrected, he writes, which of course links directly to Jesus' divinity, His being the son of God, then "we are still in our sins."

We have in our offices a very troubling book entitled Why Christianity Must Change or Die, written by a theologian who has abandoned all concepts of Jesus as a divine, resurrected, alive-today Son of God. To him, Jesus was a good teacher who was tragically executed around 31 A.D. — and that's it. So what is "forgiveness" to this searching man? Here's a direct quote:

"Confession is my being confronting the Ground of all Being, and forgiveness is my moving beyond my limits into something more real, more whole, more life giving than I can now contemplate."

There's no thought here of "Jesus paid it all." "What can take away my sin? Nothing but the blood of Jesus." All that is out, if Jesus Christ is only a good teacher, a compatriot of the Aristotles and Buddhas of Planet Earth.

In his book, Living Faith, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter has an anecdote which might have meaning to our friend, this young mother who was so desperate for forgiveness. Should she just keep on? Should she "strive without ceasing," as the Buddha advised? Here's what Carter writes:

"[My sister Ruth's] faith was beautiful in every way. She loved people and devoted her ministry primarily to those who had lost hope in life. No matter what had happened to them, whether it was drug addiction, alcoholism, infidelity, or crime, she was able to convince them to place the affliction on the shoulders of Christ and in that way to overcome it."

On the shoulders of Christ. The living Christ. The Son-of-God Christ, the only Lamb who takes away the sin of the world.

 

Go back to the top