![]() |
| Copyright © 2003 by The Voice of Prophecy |
| David B. Smith |
|
P.O.
Box 53055 |
| April 9, 2003 |
|
MOUNTAINTOP LOYALTY: THE ELIJAH
EXPERIENCE #3
STOLEN CREDIT LINES I don’t know if you’ve ever had the experience of having
some enemy, some adversary, take your stuff, your things . . . and then
use them in a campaign against you. Someone comes into your house, takes
your gun, and fires it at someone in your family. A trust officer at the
bank dips into your funds and uses them to sabotage the good you’re trying
to do in the community. A person you thought was your friend — and you
wired cash to them at the city where your daughter is going to college,
for the purpose of helping her with school — takes that money and uses
it to seduce her away from you! “[The Queen and Lady-Mother [faces] the choice between ascending to perfection or following an older world to corruption.” And as this war of words and arguments continues, Ransom
is continually frustrated as Weston — actually Satan — takes everything
good God has created and uses it against God. Things like liberty, freedom
of choice, loyalty — which are all God’s creations — Weston twists around
with diabolical cunning and makes them look like pillars in his own fallen
government. And he goes on to paint this fascinating, lofty, almost noble
word picture of the maturity it takes, the bold vision required for a
Queen like herself to break the commandment of God. All the great programs
of earth, he boasts, all the inventions, all the progressive achievements
on Thulcandra — the silent planet — are surely because Eden’s own queen,
a similarly beautiful woman named Eve, had the courage to learn the art
of disobedience, to eat the apple and become “older.” “The storm cloud was his chariot, thunder his voice, and lightning his spear and arrows.” Now notice: “The worship of Baal involved sacred prostitution and sometimes even child sacrifice.” Ashtoreth, we read in the same text notes, was a female consort of Baal, associated with the evening star, and portrayed as a beautiful goddess of war and fertility. “Worship of the Ashtoreths,” these scholars write, “involved extremely lascivious practices.” So we see a couple of obvious realities here. First of all, Baal worship was sensual, erotic, intriguing, and just plain X-rated. It was pornographic pleasure, involving temple prostitution and degrading activities. We studied yesterday how the heathen culture all around Israel seeped into the camp . . . and it’s plain now why that would happen. I don’t know if you remember hearing a number of years
ago about a North American cult called “Children of God.” Sometimes they
went by the name “The Family,” and you know, to this day you can log onto
the Internet and check out their very attractive web site. But founder
David Berg, who died some years ago, actually used a recruiting tactic
he proudly called “Flirty Fishing.” His female converts would go out into
the streets and playgrounds and recruit young men into their ranks using
out-and-out promiscuity. They would sleep with a guy just to get him to
join. And, like we also said yesterday, “The more things change, the more
they stay the same.” David Berg’s cult following grew by leaps and bounds,
and in the time of Elijah, the temple of Baal was the exploding megachurch
of the day — even right in Israel. This became especially true when King
Ahab, led into sin by his wife Jezebel, brazenly imported Baal worship
right into the heart of the Hebrew empire, erecting a temple to this fallen
sex god, establishing “groves” of worship and the whole nine yards. “According to Baalist theology, rain is simply Baal impregnating the earth in order that it bring forth its crops.” It was all very sexy. Another reference book on this topic, entitled Prophets and Kings, makes the same point: “The worshipers of Baal claimed that the treasures of heaven, the dew and the rain, came not from Jehovah, but from the ruling forces of nature, and that it was through the creative energy of the sun that the earth was enriched and made to bring forth abundantly.” Now right here is where we see the conundrum faced
by God. Who is it, actually, who graciously waters the earth with dew
and rain? Well, that’s the Lord of all heaven and earth, of course. You
know that and I know that. In the goodness of God, we have air to breathe
and sunshine to warm us and rain to sustain us. But, as he always does,
Lucifer steals the treasures of heaven – since he has zero creative powers
of his own – hands them out with his own business card stapled to them,
and then smirks as he receives the worship of misled recipients. In old
Israel, God was protecting His people, nurturing their crops, and watering
their fertile land. And season after season, who was getting the credit
for the rain? Baal was. And along with the worship and devotion of all
Israel, Baal was also receiving the living human sacrifices of Jewish
babies. The adultery and fornication and blood ceremonies that went with
every temple ritual. The hearts and minds of young men and women who married
“outside the faith” and became part of the growing pagan community that
was infiltrating from within the city of God. “The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away.” Now, of course, that is simply not a true statement.
It was Satan who took it all away; the Bible plainly says so. But God
gets the blame for the bad, and false deities like Baal were getting all
of Israel’s praise for the showers of blessing that kept the nation green
and prosperous. “God loves to bless His people,” writes Dr. Beatrice Neall, “but when they forsake Him, He speaks to them through blessings REMOVED. God chose to destroy [Baal’s] claim by revealing that He alone is responsible for the earth’s treasures – sunshine, rain, and abundant harvests.” Then she adds this oh-so-true diagnosis for our generation: “We so often tend to forget God in times of prosperity and seek Him in times of adversity.” You know, friend, most of the time when we watch TV, we don’t pay much attention to the closing credits. When it comes to spiritual things and the blessings in our path, maybe we ought to read them with a little more diligence. |
|
|