![]() |
| Copyright © 2004 by The Voice of Prophecy |
| David B. Smith |
|
P.O.
Box 53055 |
| September 23, 2004 |
|
DO GOD’S PEOPLE WATCH HBO AND
SHOWTIME? #4
LEARNING A LESSON FROM LINUS Clear back in 1966, a theological book came out that promised to shake the very foundations of the Christian faith. It was entitled The Gospel According to Peanuts, by Robert Short, and there was a great big picture of Charlie Brown right on the cover. I’m really not speaking tongue in cheek, because on the BACK cover, a review by The Young Calvinist wrote in all seriousness: “This could be one of the most important Christian books published in our time.” Mr. Short dedicated the book to his parents, observing
that in raising him and his siblings, they had truly “acquired real appreciation
for the full meaning of ‘Good grief!’” “For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person — such a man is an idolater — has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.” The King James puts it: “whoremonger, unclean person,
covetous man, idolater.” And even if you think your security blanket has
a much milder fabric design than what’s described here, it’s disquieting
to read that certain types of people simply will not get past the pearly
gates. And we ask: “Even if we come to Jesus? Even if we repent? Even
if we invite the Holy Spirit to change us? But what if the change is too
slow? What if we fall away?” Etc. Etc. These are hard questions, and they
cause many Christians — people who have sat in the pew for many years
and read their Bibles through — to wonder: Am I really saved? I love the
Lord, but I still have covetous feelings. And sometimes impure thoughts.
Most of us are probably fairly sure that we aren’t full-fledged “whoremongers,”
but are we sometimes unclean? Do we have idols — in the forms of material
goods or SUVs? “Passion, whether for money or for sexual indulgence, is in effect putting an idol and object of desire and worship BEFORE God. To the Jew idolatry was the worst of sins, and perhaps [F. F.] Bruce is right in saying that ‘The part which the commandment against covetousness played in Paul’s own spiritual experience no doubt made him acutely aware of the special deadliness of this subtle sin.’” You remember that in Romans 7:7 Paul admits that he’s personally struggled with the temptation of coveting. Here’s his confession: “I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, ‘Do not covet.’” In fact, in the King James it’s suggested that Paul grappled with lust – that was the kind of coveting he had a hard time with. So he knows what he’s writing about here. Let’s continue with that Tyndale commentary for verse 5: “The solemn warning of judgment that is connected here with the ‘sins of the flesh,’” writes Francis Foulkes, “raises certain questions in the minds of many. Are these sins worse than all others? Is it implied that sexual sin is the unforgivable sin, that debars man irrevocably from the kingdom of God?” It seems that way sometimes, especially in recent years, with priests and preachers only getting in trouble for pedophilia and not for pilfering or pride. Can a person be forgiven for adultery and fornication? And the answer is yes. Forgiveness AND cleansing . . . AND victory are all possible. Dr. Foulkes continues: “Paul could tell his readers that some of them HAD been guilty of these sins once, but now they were made new, pardoned, cleansed. Indeed we cannot say that these sins are viewed in the New Testament as worse than the sins of pride and the subtler forms of self-centeredness. But neither Law nor Prophets in the Old Testament, nor Gospels nor Epistles in the New Testament, allow men to regard lightly the sins that break the bonds of marriage, destroy the sanctity of the family, and cause children to be brought to birth without parents to be responsible for their care and nurture.” That’s a good point, isn’t it? Were the recent scandals
of sexual abuse serious? Absolutely. So much was at risk. The vulnerable
lives of young children were being permanently scarred. And yet Paul gives
us the good news. “This is what some of you WERE,” he says triumphantly
in First Corinthians 6. “But when you put Christ first in your life, when
you allowed Him to do His work, then a pattern of victory emerged.” Sometimes
there are setbacks. Sometimes we slip and fall. Sometimes we lapse back
into embracing that security blanket, of joining Linus’s grandma in the
clutches of a 32-cup caffeine high. “The greedy person,” the scholars write, “wants things MORE than he wants God.” That’s really it; who’s Number One in your life? “[And he] puts THINGS in place of God, thereby committing adultery.” Then they add: “The person who PERSISTS in sexual or other kinds of greed has excluded God, who therefore excludes him from the kingdom.” Well, friend, we certainly don’t want to end on that
note. Maybe we could close instead by remembering the late, great Charles
Schulz, who created all those sweet, jealous, blanket-clutching kids for
these many delightful decades. Schulz himself was a dedicated Christian
man who, despite the millions of dollars he made from his syndicated strip,
always put the Lord Jesus Christ first. “A cartoonist must be given a
chance to do his own preaching,” he once said, and he eloquently did so.
|
|
|