![]() |
| Copyright © 2005 by The Voice of Prophecy |
|
P.O.
Box 53055 |
| July 8, 2005 |
|
DUAL CITIZENSHIP #5
“PEACE AT ALL COSTS” IS TOO EXPENSIVE Things were going just great at the First Fictional Adventist Church of Anytown, U.S.A. The pastor and the congregation alike were committed to growth, to unity, to having peace and keeping the peace. The minister regularly worked the concept of harmony into his sermons, quoting from Matthew 5, and the Sabbath School classes discussed the issue in their study sessions. “You must purge the evil from among you,” Moses writes in Deuteronomy 17. We bring these vigilante-like passages to the table today because our topic for the week is DUAL CITIZENSHIP. We, as Christians, may consider ourselves as citizens of heaven, but we still have responsibilities here on earth. And we have to decide how to respond to those responsibilities, and how to react to evil. Consider some of the recent military goings-on of my country and others, where evil men were driven to cover by Bradleys, Humvees, Chinook helicopters, and laser-guided cluster bombs. Is it compatible with Christianity for people to pull those triggers and kill their fellow human beings? We often quote the peace-making guidelines of Matthew 18, which advise a concerned citizen to “go to his brother alone.” But the fact is that some brothers will not listen. There are people in the church, and there are tyrants in the world, who are going to continue persecuting others and stockpiling sinful things, things designed to blow up churches and cities and the people in those churches and cities. So “if it is possible,” you live in peace. If it is not possible, then sometimes God’s people are to join with others to do what is necessary. “We must do whatever we can to promote peace by avoiding conflicts and violence. But the phrase ‘if possible’ suggests that sometimes peace is not possible. There are situations when peace can only be maintained through armed conflicts designed to ward off aggressors. If we are aware of evil intentions by an individual or a nation to harm others, we would hardly keep the ‘peace’ by giving in to their demands. It would be morally irresponsible to turn over one’s wife to a rapist just to ‘keep peace.’” That borrows from yesterday’s story. “For even when we were with you,” Paul writes, “we gave you this rule: ‘If a man will not work, he shall not eat.’” The same Bacchiocchi essay has a timely quotation from a Gleason Archer, writing in the book, Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties. Notice: “Is it really a manifestation of goodness to furnish no opposition to evil?” he asks. “Can we say that a truly good surgeon should do nothing to cut away cancerous tissue from his patient and simply allow him to go on suffering until finally he dies? Can we praise a police force that stands idly by and offers no slightest resistance to the armed robber, the rapist, the arsonist, or any other criminal who preys on society? How could God be called ‘good’ if He forbade His people to protect their wives . . . and . . . children?” Indeed, how could we call God our Father if He forbade us to protect our families? We’ve made reference to things that have happened in Iraq in recent years – pondering how Christians should respond, what our proper role is. Well, perhaps the aftermath of war can she some light. In the turmoil that resulted from war, many parents have had to take an active role in protecting their children from evil. One devoted dad had three pretty girls, each attending a different school. He knew it was his responsibility to protect them, and that’s what he devoted his life to. It was about all he could do: deliver them to school and pick them up after school . . . just to make sure no one ELSE picked them up. That is what a good dad does, and if he needs to carry a big stick, well, the bigger the better. Is it any different with OUR heavenly Father? Author Gleason Archer finishes his thought: “No nation could retain its liberty or preserve the lives of its citizens if it were prevented from maintaining any sort of army for its defense. It is therefore incumbent on a ‘good God’ to include the right of self-defense as the prerogative of His people. He would not be good at all if He were to turn the world over to the horrors of unbridled cruelty perpetrated by violent and bloody criminals or unchecked aggression of invading armies.” But friend, let’s close with the reality that God’s Word, while encouraging a sturdy defense of the weak among us, and a united front against destructive sin, also preaches relentless redemption. That serial adulterer was to be sent out of the church in the explicit hope that he would come to his senses and be restored. “His spirit saved on the day of the Lord” is how Paul puts it. Wise forgiveness and lasting reconciliation are always the way of the Christian, who should be eternally eager to lay down arms and embrace his former enemy.
|
|
|